Viewing entries tagged
Well Made

Comment

A Punt is What You Make It: what football teaches leaders about decision making

Over the past few years, I have been seeing up close the intersection of athletics and business in my role as the CMO of LEARFIELD. I believe sports have many lessons to teach us about decision making that can be applied beyond the field of play. This blog series compares game day decisions and those faced by business leaders providing some insights from the greatest minds in sports that can improve your business.

One of my favorite episodes of Young Sheldon is where the genius child of a west Texas high school football coach tells his Dad matter-of-factly that according to the statistics it is better to “go for it” on a fourth down than it is to punt. It takes some convincing, but in the end the team does well with the new, unconventional strategy. The decision that coaches make on how to handle fourth downs has lessons for us about crisis management.

For those reading who might not be as familiar with American football (preferring perhaps the round ball variety played everywhere else), a 4th down is the offensive’s teams last chance to move the ball or score before they have to surrender it to the opponent and risk being scored upon. This is where strategy can fall victim to panic and impatience. The team’s back is against the proverbial wall. They still have control of the ball, but their control is tenuous and threatened.

There are many situations that put businesses into similar positions. Perhaps a company has invested extensively into new market expansion or new technology and are running out of time to have those investments pay off. Perhaps they are facing new pressures externally from the market or economy, or internally from their board of directors, which is causing them to change their style of play. Perhaps the current leadership is under performance pressure and feel like they are in a 4th down predicament.

In these situations, football has some strategy lessons for leaders under risk and scrutiny. Like Shelton Cooper demonstrated, expert advice will vary, but here are some rules of thumb and how they might apply to your team:

  1. Field Position Matters: Most advise that teams should not punt the ball on the opponent’s side of the field, and really only after crossing your own 40-yard line. Anything less than that puts the opponent in good scoring position is there is a turn-over on downs. Similarly, if you are in a competitive environment and the risk of not progressing forward is higher than the risk of pulling back, then you should proceed. If you have spent 2 years developing a promising new pharmaceutical or technology and know that your competitors are only months behind you in their development, it might make sense to continue to launch, so that you can achieve market adoption first.

  2. Scoring May Not Be The Immediate Goal: In football, as in business, it is a long game. Not every play results in a touchdown or field goal. Sometimes moving the chains is the goal. Some times field position dictates that the special teams should come out and try to kick a field goal, instead of trying to move the ball or score a run or pass touchdown. That only makes sense if ball would be placed confidently in the range of your kicker. In business, this is where your knowledge of the market and your knowledge of your team combine. Not every team has the same capabilities, especially true in college matchups and in your business. So, it is critical to remind yourself of yourself of your differentiating strengths and what the team can reasonably accomplish under pressure. Sometimes that means putting points on the score board. Sometimes that means living to fight another day.

  3. A Punt Isn’t Always a Defeat: If on the 4th down there is no reasonable chance to achieve a 1st down or to score, then the team will choose to punt. The goal here is to give the ball to the opponent, but place it as far away as possible. There are many ways that business emulate this behavior. Instead of developing a marketable product, some firms will secure intellectual property so that anyone attempting to bring to market a product in the space has to license their technology. Sometimes what a company learned through a market or product development process reveals that the market need isn’t as substantial or profitable as they once thought. In this case, ceding the space to a competitor might have them chasing low-return opportunities, while you go on to solve larger or more impactful customer needs. Perhaps you believed in the strategy, but outside forces are causing you to pick different priorities. Although it is hard to stop investing in something you believed in or to pivot an organization to a new strategy, it is often best to ignore the sunk cost and move to a new strategy.

In my book, Well Made Decisions, I write about the importance remaining nimble after a high-stakes decision is made. After all, it is after the decision where all of the results occur. There no such thing as a right decision in many cases, but one that was made right (or deemed wrong) by what happened after the play was called. You see this on the field of play as well, where punts are returned for touchdowns, or the ball is recovered in other ways to change the momentum of the game. Through great communication, a grasp of the fundamentals of the business, and candid truth-telling and teamwork, great teams can perform well even when they face 4th down situations.

Comment

Comment

Take What’s Yours: What Baseball Teaches Us About Entering Adjacent Markets

Over the past few years, I have been seeing up close the intersection of athletics and business in my role as the CMO of LEARFIELD. I believe sports have many lessons to teach us about decision making that can be applied beyond the field of play.  This blog series compares game day decisions and those faced by business leaders providing some insights from the greatest minds in sports that can improve your business.

Baseball is a game that is highly instrumented. Everything is measured and tracked. This makes it a great source for data-driven leadership lessons. The game also has a rich tradition and lots of rules that change every season. In September, the MLB has changed the size of official bases which some speculate will make it easier for runners to steal bases. You can see the comparison of the old and new bases in the background of the graphic above.

A base is “stolen” when a runner advances to a base to which “they are not entitled” (seems a little judgy, Wikipedia) and they are deemed safe at the next base.  It apparently first happened in either 1863 or 1865 with Ned Cuthbert playing for the Philadelphia Keystones. 

Even if that is true, they will have some big records to beat! There is a now-retired MLB player, Rickey Henderson, who racked up an incredible 1,406 stolen bases in his career.  In the 1887 season, Hugh Nicol racked up 138 stolen bases in a single season for the Cincinnati Red Stockings (AA), although it is speculated that not all of Hugh’s would meet the “modern” rules. Modern rules established (gulp!) in 1898.

Stealing bases holds some interesting lessons for business leaders interested in entering adjacent markets.  If a business is well-established in a category or with a particular customer set, what can that company do to take its current product to new markets or to serve their current customers in new ways?

  1. Know the Score: It is critical that players on the field know score, the inning, the out count, and the position of all the players on base and those on the hitting roster. Otherwise, they will not do the right thing. The same is true in business. Before considering any impactful decision, one must understand the current situation clearly, including the businesses' ability and appetite to invest.

  2. Managing Risk-Reward: Not all stolen bases attempted are successful. There is certainly risk associated with business expansion which should be explored. In my book, Well Made Decisions, I write about the importance of customer obsession and the practice of writing out strategy to mitigate risk. One useful practice is to do a pre-mortem to identify the potential derailers to your plan, before you implement. This is what baseball coaches and players do when they are making real-time decisions on the field. Before they take their foot off the base, they are calculating probabilities. Analysis of adjacent markets often use the 2x2 matrix I illustrated with bases above. You can choose to take existing products to new customers. Or you can choose to bring new offerings to your existing markets. The further away you get from your current customers or markets or your current products or technologies, the more risk. Talking candidly about those risks and mitigating them can be the key to getting the buy-in and cooperation the business will need.

Comment

Comment

Why Decisions Aren’t Important (and other provocative realities of business leadership)

unsplash-image-aoN3HWLbhdI.jpg

This article was first published on the Graziadio Business Review blog through Pepperdine University on April 2, 2021.

As someone who has spent many years in the c-suite and been at the helm or at the table for high-stakes decisions related to mergers and acquisition, technology investments, market adoption, and cultural transformation, I have a different perspective.

Decisions, like invention, are 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration. And most of that work happens after the decision is made. As a mentor of mine, Balaji Krishnamurthy from ThinkShift, shared with me, you can strive to make the right decision and then you have to work to make the decision right. Good intentions and even good decision science isn’t enough. You have to make decisions work.

As I have reflected on my experience, interviewed dozens of business leaders, and deeply researched the topic of business decision making and implementation for my upcoming book (expected in August from New Degree Press), I am struck by a few common threads that tie well-made decisions to the creation of well-made companies.

Decisions Have a Context

In your organization today, thousands of decisions are being made by leaders at all levels of the organization. It is true that high-impact decisions that require significant capital investment or human resources have multiple input streams that converge into a choice. My experience and research shows that input and convergence is aided greatly by talented employees, great access to relevant data (both supporting and disconfirming), and a culture of customer-obsession. Without these things, decisions will likely underperform, no matter how much analysis went into them.

When Quaker decided to buy Snapple for $1.7 billion, it intended to repeat the success they previously had with their acquisition of Gatorade years earlier. But it was a series of missteps with the channel structure and brand that lead to the $1.4 billion loss when they sold it to Triarc Beverages for a paltry $300 million. Three years later, Triarc sold it to Cadbury Schweppes for about $1 billion. The difference, according to experts, were factors like alignment of culture, corporate temperament, and the ability of the organization to listen to its customers.[1] In other words, decisions made after the acquisition could have turned the tide.

Decisions Are a Starting Line

Decisions are often seen as the finish line of a host of data-driven analysis, but they are in fact, the starting line for a whole host of follow-on decisions, investments, and actions. If making a choice is an act of convergence, immediately the tasks diverge, into multiple workstreams, across multiple groups, functions, levels, and geographies to make the decision right. If you were to add up the human hours that went into making major decisions with all the work that went into the implementation, it would be a miniscule fraction. Executive time, commissioned research, investment banker fees, and the like are nothing compared to the cost of implementing brand changes, moving factories, investing in new technology, finding synergies in the organization, or implementing a transformational strategy. Yet, leaders often spend more time thinking about what goes into the decision than what might come out of it.

I have been involved in several mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures in my career. In many cases, my role was to create the internal and external communication plans that told the world about the change. I have been a part of planning efforts lasting a few weeks and others lasting a few hours. And I can tell you that thinking through second order consequences and reviewing draft communications with the subject matter experts who were privy to the deal takes time, but is worth it. Leaders shouldn’t cheat themselves out of results by not setting themselves up in the starting blocks. If they fall in exhaustion over the finish line of making a choice, they will not succeed in the race that begins at the moment the choice is made.

Decision Processes Matter More than Decisions

Most decisions are not like picking lottery numbers or finding the answer to a math problem. Josh Stump is a business litigator and the President of Buckley Law in Portland, Oregon. He advises his clients that sometimes making choices is like following the GPS in their car. They come to a fork in the road and can turn left or right. At that moment, there might be an optimal choice, based on the data that is available at the time. To the right might be an accident that is slowing traffic or to the left might be construction. However, no matter the choice, the savvy driver can navigate (perhaps with some expert help) to their destination either way.

The same is true in most business decisions. The process by which directions are set, teams are aligned with great communication, truth is sought out, and teams are engaged in implementation makes all the difference. Even when decisions are reversed and businesses pivot to new strategies, they are doing so with the benefit of hindsight and what they learned.

References

[1] https://hbr.org/2002/01/how-snapple-got-its-juice-back

Comment