Viewing entries tagged
Decision Making

Comment

A Punt is What You Make It: what football teaches leaders about decision making

Over the past few years, I have been seeing up close the intersection of athletics and business in my role as the CMO of LEARFIELD. I believe sports have many lessons to teach us about decision making that can be applied beyond the field of play. This blog series compares game day decisions and those faced by business leaders providing some insights from the greatest minds in sports that can improve your business.

One of my favorite episodes of Young Sheldon is where the genius child of a west Texas high school football coach tells his Dad matter-of-factly that according to the statistics it is better to “go for it” on a fourth down than it is to punt. It takes some convincing, but in the end the team does well with the new, unconventional strategy. The decision that coaches make on how to handle fourth downs has lessons for us about crisis management.

For those reading who might not be as familiar with American football (preferring perhaps the round ball variety played everywhere else), a 4th down is the offensive’s teams last chance to move the ball or score before they have to surrender it to the opponent and risk being scored upon. This is where strategy can fall victim to panic and impatience. The team’s back is against the proverbial wall. They still have control of the ball, but their control is tenuous and threatened.

There are many situations that put businesses into similar positions. Perhaps a company has invested extensively into new market expansion or new technology and are running out of time to have those investments pay off. Perhaps they are facing new pressures externally from the market or economy, or internally from their board of directors, which is causing them to change their style of play. Perhaps the current leadership is under performance pressure and feel like they are in a 4th down predicament.

In these situations, football has some strategy lessons for leaders under risk and scrutiny. Like Shelton Cooper demonstrated, expert advice will vary, but here are some rules of thumb and how they might apply to your team:

  1. Field Position Matters: Most advise that teams should not punt the ball on the opponent’s side of the field, and really only after crossing your own 40-yard line. Anything less than that puts the opponent in good scoring position is there is a turn-over on downs. Similarly, if you are in a competitive environment and the risk of not progressing forward is higher than the risk of pulling back, then you should proceed. If you have spent 2 years developing a promising new pharmaceutical or technology and know that your competitors are only months behind you in their development, it might make sense to continue to launch, so that you can achieve market adoption first.

  2. Scoring May Not Be The Immediate Goal: In football, as in business, it is a long game. Not every play results in a touchdown or field goal. Sometimes moving the chains is the goal. Some times field position dictates that the special teams should come out and try to kick a field goal, instead of trying to move the ball or score a run or pass touchdown. That only makes sense if ball would be placed confidently in the range of your kicker. In business, this is where your knowledge of the market and your knowledge of your team combine. Not every team has the same capabilities, especially true in college matchups and in your business. So, it is critical to remind yourself of yourself of your differentiating strengths and what the team can reasonably accomplish under pressure. Sometimes that means putting points on the score board. Sometimes that means living to fight another day.

  3. A Punt Isn’t Always a Defeat: If on the 4th down there is no reasonable chance to achieve a 1st down or to score, then the team will choose to punt. The goal here is to give the ball to the opponent, but place it as far away as possible. There are many ways that business emulate this behavior. Instead of developing a marketable product, some firms will secure intellectual property so that anyone attempting to bring to market a product in the space has to license their technology. Sometimes what a company learned through a market or product development process reveals that the market need isn’t as substantial or profitable as they once thought. In this case, ceding the space to a competitor might have them chasing low-return opportunities, while you go on to solve larger or more impactful customer needs. Perhaps you believed in the strategy, but outside forces are causing you to pick different priorities. Although it is hard to stop investing in something you believed in or to pivot an organization to a new strategy, it is often best to ignore the sunk cost and move to a new strategy.

In my book, Well Made Decisions, I write about the importance remaining nimble after a high-stakes decision is made. After all, it is after the decision where all of the results occur. There no such thing as a right decision in many cases, but one that was made right (or deemed wrong) by what happened after the play was called. You see this on the field of play as well, where punts are returned for touchdowns, or the ball is recovered in other ways to change the momentum of the game. Through great communication, a grasp of the fundamentals of the business, and candid truth-telling and teamwork, great teams can perform well even when they face 4th down situations.

Comment

Comment

Hurry Up and Decide: What Football Teaches Leaders about Speed

Over the past few years, I have been seeing up close the intersection of athletics and business in my role as the CMO of LEARFIELD.  I believe sports have many lessons to teach us about decision making that can be applied beyond the field of play.  This blog series compares game day decisions and those faced by business leaders providing some insights from the greatest minds in sports that can improve your business.

My family became fans of University of Oregon football in the heady days when Chip Kelly wore the headset and Marcus Mariota led the team from the quarterback position.  Their famed hurry-up offense delivered wins, a Rose Bowl victory, and a Heisman for Mariota, not to an impressive football center on campus named in his honor.  In the first video example above, there are a scant 17 seconds between the end of the first down and the beginning of the second.

For those who might not be familiar, a hurry-up offense is a style of play in American football where the team with the ball avoids or shortens their huddle in an attempt to limit or disrupt defensive strategies or flexibility.  It prevents the defense from substituting players and maintains a game momentum.  I understand the no-huddle offense was pioneered by the Cincinnati Bengals and was used in the 1990’s by the Buffalo Bills.  The point is to use the clock to wear your opponent down and maintain control of the game play.

Mary Barra, the CEO of General Motors was asked was keeps her up at night and she said “speed.”1  In her case it isn’t about the acceleration of her vehicles, although that might be an issue that some of her team work on, but rather the speed to business.  Leaders from Bill Gates to Elon Musk to Sam Altman from the Y Combinator for start-ups have all spoken about the differentiation that speed is to a business.

In my book, Well Made Decisions, I have a chapter entitled “A Case for Now” where I detail the benefits and strategies around making decisions faster.  In other words, how can you do it now?  Here are a few useful tips if you want to accelerate your business:

1.       Evaluate the kind of decision you are making.  It if is reversible (borrowing language from Amazon’s Jeff Bezos who called these “two way door” decisions), then decide now.  You will find that most decisions are reversible, which should empower your teams.  If you know what play to run, run it.

2.       Don’t wait for external deadlines.  Set your own forcing mechanisms to ensure that momentum is being maintained.  In football speak, you could take a huddle without penalty, but you choose an up-tempo alternative in order to gain a competitive advantage.

3.       Remember, slow is expensive.  Oregon’s season would have been very different if they had chosen a conventional pace. Anything that takes time or introduces ambiguity into your organization has huge implications on your productivity and efficiency.  Don’t ever wait for certainty to choose clarity.

Comment

Comment

All Business Decisions are Career Decisions

unsplash-image-nMffL1zjbw4.jpg

Have you ever witnessed “analysis paralysis”?  A lot of business leaders are faulted with cautiously procrastinating decisions until the “best” choice is in full view, and in doing so they become a competitive follower, miss the market opportunity, or create other cultural challenges in their organization.

Leaders will delay letting go an employee who is struggling, wreaking havoc on the company and customers, demotivating other high-performers, and delaying the chance to get someone in that role who will help create real growth and advancement.

Leaders will delay investing in a new market or technology for fear that the return will not materialize, only to find someone else beat them to market forcing them to a play a game for which they did not dictate the rules.

Leaders will observe things about the culture that when replicated at scale will keep the organization from achieving its highest performance (eg, things like lack of honest candor, lack of accountability, misaligned priorities).  Letting it go until it demands correction (or takes the sacrifice of the leader themselves to regard).

Leaders might be hesitant to delegate to their teams and employees, communicating a lack of trust and throttling the capacity and velocity of the organization as they are personally involved in too many decisions.  I have seen leaders of multi-billion-dollar corporations get involved in picking out the color of lobby furniture, selecting the IP telephony system, or the brand of copiers in the offices, to the detriment of the decisions that only they could make.

Why?  Why can leaders behave in these ways that sabotage their businesses? 

Ironically, it is because of a false sense of self-preservation that leads to these acts of self-sabotage.  Let me explain.

Every business decision, above a certain scale and level of complexity, is a career decision.  If you are the one allocating resources and setting priorities (which I would argue is every leader’s responsibility, starting personally and expanding to teams and organizations), then the pressure is on to make the “right decisions.” 

All eyes are on you, it would seem, and the organization, shareholders, communities, and customers are counting on you!

That kind of pressure can narrow your focus, can dial up fear, and can cause leaders to try to control what they can.  But this is generally the opposite of what is called for in these situations.

The role of the leader is to enable their team to be successful, satisfying the needs of customers.  This means having the right talent, making the right resources available, and building a culture of high-velocity learning that differentiates your business long-term. 

In my new book, Well Made Decisions, I hope leaders find the tools and most of all, the confidence, to lead their organizations in different ways.  By focusing on the process and anticipating and monitoring implementation, only then can they achieve success for their teams, their organizations, and ultimately their careers.

This article originally appeared on wellmadedecisions.com.

Comment

Comment

Well Made Decisions Now Available!

Published image.png

You may have seen that my book, Well Made Decisions, has been published by New Degree Press.   As a thank you to everyone who supported me in my author’s journey, my publisher let me offer the first ebooks for 99-cents (for 30 days or 500 books, whichever comes first).  I am alerting my friends, colleagues, and all those who supported me by sharing about the book, liking my posts along the way, and otherwise encouraging me in the writing of this book.  I could not have done it without you! 

I’d love to hear what you thought about the book!  It is my goal to have 200 reviews in the first 100 days and I’d love for you to be one of the them!  I would be so appreciative if you noted what you thought useful and your honest star rating or recommendation on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, GoodReads, or Reddit.  The discounted ebook will allow you to leave a verified purchase review.

Although I do not have grandiose commercial expectations for this book, I do believe in the lessons that it includes.  I am STILL not tired of talking about decision making even after a year of deep reflection, study, analysis, interviews, and writing and rewriting that the book required.  In fact, I would love to have more business leaders like yourself engaging with the content and finding ways to make their businesses better.  I have already found it so useful as my beta readers and author community have shared their experiences and can’t wait to set a larger table for future discussion and engagement.

For every review received on Amazon, I plan to donate $1 to the Well Made Scholarship fund, the first two of which will be awarded this Fall to assist students with their decision of going to college.

Thank you for helping me spread the word about this book and for helping me reach my goal for 200 reviews in the first 100 days!

Jennifer

P.S.  No special code is required to take advantage of the special price. The response to my pre-sale was so overwhelmingly positive, I wanted to give back to the community who blessed me with their support.  If you did pre-order signed copies of the paperback edition, these will be shipping out in early September as planned!

Comment

Comment

Why Decisions Aren’t Important (and other provocative realities of business leadership)

unsplash-image-aoN3HWLbhdI.jpg

This article was first published on the Graziadio Business Review blog through Pepperdine University on April 2, 2021.

As someone who has spent many years in the c-suite and been at the helm or at the table for high-stakes decisions related to mergers and acquisition, technology investments, market adoption, and cultural transformation, I have a different perspective.

Decisions, like invention, are 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration. And most of that work happens after the decision is made. As a mentor of mine, Balaji Krishnamurthy from ThinkShift, shared with me, you can strive to make the right decision and then you have to work to make the decision right. Good intentions and even good decision science isn’t enough. You have to make decisions work.

As I have reflected on my experience, interviewed dozens of business leaders, and deeply researched the topic of business decision making and implementation for my upcoming book (expected in August from New Degree Press), I am struck by a few common threads that tie well-made decisions to the creation of well-made companies.

Decisions Have a Context

In your organization today, thousands of decisions are being made by leaders at all levels of the organization. It is true that high-impact decisions that require significant capital investment or human resources have multiple input streams that converge into a choice. My experience and research shows that input and convergence is aided greatly by talented employees, great access to relevant data (both supporting and disconfirming), and a culture of customer-obsession. Without these things, decisions will likely underperform, no matter how much analysis went into them.

When Quaker decided to buy Snapple for $1.7 billion, it intended to repeat the success they previously had with their acquisition of Gatorade years earlier. But it was a series of missteps with the channel structure and brand that lead to the $1.4 billion loss when they sold it to Triarc Beverages for a paltry $300 million. Three years later, Triarc sold it to Cadbury Schweppes for about $1 billion. The difference, according to experts, were factors like alignment of culture, corporate temperament, and the ability of the organization to listen to its customers.[1] In other words, decisions made after the acquisition could have turned the tide.

Decisions Are a Starting Line

Decisions are often seen as the finish line of a host of data-driven analysis, but they are in fact, the starting line for a whole host of follow-on decisions, investments, and actions. If making a choice is an act of convergence, immediately the tasks diverge, into multiple workstreams, across multiple groups, functions, levels, and geographies to make the decision right. If you were to add up the human hours that went into making major decisions with all the work that went into the implementation, it would be a miniscule fraction. Executive time, commissioned research, investment banker fees, and the like are nothing compared to the cost of implementing brand changes, moving factories, investing in new technology, finding synergies in the organization, or implementing a transformational strategy. Yet, leaders often spend more time thinking about what goes into the decision than what might come out of it.

I have been involved in several mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures in my career. In many cases, my role was to create the internal and external communication plans that told the world about the change. I have been a part of planning efforts lasting a few weeks and others lasting a few hours. And I can tell you that thinking through second order consequences and reviewing draft communications with the subject matter experts who were privy to the deal takes time, but is worth it. Leaders shouldn’t cheat themselves out of results by not setting themselves up in the starting blocks. If they fall in exhaustion over the finish line of making a choice, they will not succeed in the race that begins at the moment the choice is made.

Decision Processes Matter More than Decisions

Most decisions are not like picking lottery numbers or finding the answer to a math problem. Josh Stump is a business litigator and the President of Buckley Law in Portland, Oregon. He advises his clients that sometimes making choices is like following the GPS in their car. They come to a fork in the road and can turn left or right. At that moment, there might be an optimal choice, based on the data that is available at the time. To the right might be an accident that is slowing traffic or to the left might be construction. However, no matter the choice, the savvy driver can navigate (perhaps with some expert help) to their destination either way.

The same is true in most business decisions. The process by which directions are set, teams are aligned with great communication, truth is sought out, and teams are engaged in implementation makes all the difference. Even when decisions are reversed and businesses pivot to new strategies, they are doing so with the benefit of hindsight and what they learned.

References

[1] https://hbr.org/2002/01/how-snapple-got-its-juice-back

Comment

Comment

What Do You Know

Quote_4.png

"It ain't what you know that gets you into trouble," Mark Twain supposedly wrote. "It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."

One of the concepts that I am focusing on in my book is the importance of not believing everything you think. Making and implementing decisions of impact relies on being open to different ideas, perspectives, and disconfirming arguments or data. If all goes well, you might learn something.

If all goes wrong, you definitely will! What do you think?

See www.wellmadedecisions.com.

Comment

Comment

Curiousity: the ultimate problem solver

A recent LinkedIn post by a fellow marketing exec, Jo Ann Herold, got me thinking about the best advice I have ever received.

I have been blessed with many wise mentors, coaches, and peers from whom I have learned. It is hard to pick just one piece of advice. That said, one did stand out.

Ask more questions

Maybe like you, I am a time-starved, experienced, and opinionated person who makes their living solving problems, anticipating problems, and rallying others to do the same. So, I am quick with answers. But I have learned (or am learning, to be more accurate) that more is accomplished with questions. Through questioning, root cause can really be established, customer needs can be fully understood, the talent of team members can be brought to bear, and alignment occurs more naturally. Asking “why?” five times is the staple of lean thinking and there is magic in asking questions. As a communicator-at-heart, my tendency to tell or sell can get in my way. I know I am not alone.

The other reason that asking questions is powerful is that there are more things to know than I will ever know. Others have forgotten more about subjects that I don’t know anything about. The pace of innovation, information sharing, and interconnections between us is growing so fast that the only skill or knowledge that any of us can hold for any length of time is the ability to learn and be curious.

I have a sticker on my laptop that says “Ask More Questions” (which my son picked up for me at an Alpha class he attended and thought I would like). It is a good reminder that I could heed more often.

Comment

Comment

Sliding Doors and Decision Making

The actor Gwyneth Paltrow starred in a 1998 romantic comedy-drama Sliding Doors.  In it, two storylines about one character, Helen, diverge separated by whether or not she made it to the train on the time one day.  In one plot line, she catches her boyfriend doing bad and strikes out on a whole new path, with new gumption and new haircut.  In the other, Helen is mugged, spends time in a hospital, and has a rash of other unfortunate events.  It is a thought-provoking movie and it is entertaining because we see both scenarios playing out together in parallel.  Of course, Helen is only living one life at a time and can’t see what the other alternatives look like.  It is only at the end that we realize that a good outcome would be possible via either path she took.

In the movie, the two story lines are separated by chance, but they stem from the question “do I get on this train or not?”  I know many of us sometimes wish we could watch the Sliding Doors version of our own decisions in the same way.  Which path would lead to successful outcomes and what path would lead to heartache, disappointment, or failure?  If we could see it play out on the big screen, we could make the right choice.

Ruth Chang is a philosopher.  She is a professor and chair of jurisprudence at the University of Oxford.  She is known for her research on the “incommensurability of values and on practical reason and normativity.”  In other words, she is an expert in making hard choices between options that are difficult or impossible to measure objectively.  In her TEDSalon talk a few years ago, she spoke more about how to compare the incomparable.  Her advice reminded me of Sliding Doors in three ways.

1.       We want to know how the story ends, but instead we only get to see how it starts

The audience of Sliding Doors gets a rare benefit of knowing what the outcome of two different choices played out.  Dr. Chang says in her talk that she wished “God or Netflix would send me a DVD of my two possible future careers,” in her example, so she would have chosen wisely between philosophy and law.  Sadly, this is not an option we have in real life.  Comparing Helen’s scenarios side-by-side allows the movie audience to clearly know the better, easier, more direct path to happiness.  But Helen only sees the start of her story and as it plays out day by day.  If she had been more honest with herself at the start she probably would have ditched the do-nothing boyfriend on her own (train or no train) and started off into her best new life.  Facing the truth and doing an honest assessment of where you are starting is important.

2.       Some choices can’t be weighed on a pro or con list

Dr. Chang proposes that “hard choices are not hard because of us or our ignorance; they’re hard because there no best option.”  You can’t put a number on values like beauty, kindness, joy, and justice (although we try).  They can’t be measured in length, mass, and weight.  She continues, “As post-Enlightenment creatures, we tend to assume that scientific thinking holds the key to everything of importance in our world, but the world of value is different from the world of science.” They are hard to characterize simply into pros and cons.  They go deeper and require more self-reflection and consideration, not of the external circumstances and opportunities, but of what is important to you. 

3.       No matter the choice, you choose you

In the movie, Helen was a smart, capable person.  In both scenarios.  The better outcome wasn’t a function of her intelligence.  Because this American romantic comedy stayed true to the genre, in the end of the movie, she had the promise of the best outcome in either scenario.  The only thing consistent about the two scenarios was Helen.  This is true of the choices we make as well.  Because the true outcome is unknown and unwritten, any choice you make is a bet on yourself, in many ways.  You should reflect on whether on whether one choice or another will be more true to your values, easier to execute (important that we acknowledge that, because if we are honest it factors in more than we think), or more fulfilling in some way (or which might be more fun).  In Dr. Chang’s career dilemma, she made the choice that brought her sliding doors back together.  She earned her J.D. from Harvard Law School and a D.Phil. from University of Oxford, is a practicing philosopher, and chair of the jurisprudence at her university according to her website.  In the end, it seems she bet on herself and found ways (plural) to bring her interests and talents together in a unique way.

Business decisions often work in the same way.  Being self-reflective and facing the truths of your circumstance, being stubborn on your values, and betting on yourself and your team to find a way (or many ways) is the only way you have to achieve the best outcomes.

Originally appeared on the Well Made Decisions blog.

Comment

Making Decision or "Making" Decisions

Comment

Making Decision or "Making" Decisions

Making Decisions.jpg

I do a lot of interviewing. Not only have I been building out a team of my own, but I am also a “bar raiser” at Amazon which means that I participate in many interviews in an effort to maintain a high hiring bar for roles all over the company.  I have interviewed candidates senior and junior roles ranging from software developers to economists from marketers to security guards.  I get to ask candidates about the decisions that they have made and the outcomes of those decisions.  This has sharpened my focus on decision making as a leadership skill.

Early in your career, when you are new to a role, or in some process-oriented positions, your job is to execute on decisions made by others.  You run the plays, follow instructions, and earn the trust of the organization, your colleagues, and your manager.  

As you develop your scope and influence, you are called to make decisions.  Others seek you out for answers and advice.  You look at the data and determine the ruling.  You umpire.  You judge.  Your opinion becomes the recommendation. If you make good decisions, you get to make more decisions, faster and with greater complexity and risk.  More people are impacted.  More dollars are at stake.  More is riding on you getting it right.

That broadening scope of decision impact is fairly well understood.  When interviewing, I try to assess the kind of autonomy and responsibility a person had in their previous roles by learning about the decisions that they made (or didn’t).  Decision making authority can be codified in things like spending authority.  At leading companies, cultural fit is determined by how the candidate made decisions, who they involved (or not), and how they learned from mistakes (or didn’t).  Making decisions is a litmus test of organizational seniority.

However, scope and impact of decisions aren’t the only measures of leadership.  The most impactful leaders don’t just make decisions, they create the moment of decision.  They don’t just answer questions brought to them, they ask new questions.  If you consider the business leaders who have lasting impact outside of their individual teams, business, or industry they have in common that they created disruption.  That disruption is caused not by answering the questions in front of them, but by anticipating tomorrow’s questions or forcing the answers to questions that no one else is considering.  If you wait until there is an obvious fork in the road, it may not matter which path you take.  Truth is you are too late and you have lost the race.  Why?  Because someone else created the fork in the road.  They were the first to divert from the path to create something new.  Truth is, if you are at a fork where the options are clear, you are a follower.

Most forks in the road don’t start as high-stakes decisions, thankfully.  When done best, they are small experiments, pilots, or proofs of concepts.  Small ventures, building upon each other in layers of learning, until a road is paved.  By the time others come to fork in the road, the stakes are higher.  This is what defensible differentiation is all about.  Making the fork in the road more costly for the next traveler.  Followers are faced with high-stakes decisions.  “Should we abandon their existing legacy business to pursue something that would maintain their competitiveness in the future because we can’t afford to do both?” they must ask.  Often they are forced to partner with frenemies to lower the stakes, which can be a sound approach when it is clear that there is a front-runner and it isn’t you.  But how much better would it be to have created the fork in the road?  To disrupt yourself.  The annuls of business history are littered with companies with dominant positions in their space, the bigger market share, the most loyal customers, and with the best minds in the business…who got left at a turn.

This is true of the movement of whole organizations and down at the team level as well.  Managers make decisions within the boxes on the organization chart or within the confines of the business charter.  Leaders work in the blanks between the boxes and can see possibilities.   The leadership pioneer Peter Drucker once said that “the most serious mistakes are not being made as a result of wrong answers.  The truly dangerous thing is asking the wrong question.”  Or perhaps not asking questions at all or after the answer is obvious.

As you think about your work, your short-term goals, and long-term ambitions consider your decision. : the decisions you are asked to make and what decisions you can truly make proactively.  May you have the boldness to make your own forks in the road.

Comment

Dynamic Stability: 10 Ways To Put Your Customer First

Comment

Dynamic Stability: 10 Ways To Put Your Customer First

10.10.19.png

It’s no secret that organizations today face unprecedented challenges and leaders, including marketing executives, are under pressure to deliver growth and think beyond the confines of their particular function. Jay Weiser from the Weiser Strategy Group, whose career in business strategy consulting has led him to work with top leaders across multiple industries, has seen businesses succeed and fail in their effort to keep pace. “With near-constant change and disruption, leaders and their organizations must recognize that stability is a relic of the past and what differentiated in the past isn’t adequate for the future,” he said. Here are ten concepts to help you think about cross-functional alignment and delivering an exceptional customer experience in your business:

  1. Stability is dead. In a business landscape now characterized by constant change, companies and leaders who “wait for the dust to settle” will be left in that same dust by competitors. "Understanding context is key to change,” Weiser said. “Industries are being disrupted. Customers are now better informed than company salespeople. Competitors are more aggressive."

  2. The future belongs to the nimble. “Companies who are prepared, ready, and able to act have a significant advantage over those who are not,” he noted. “They can bounce back from disruptions faster and pounce on opportunities quicker. Conversely, those who are not, often do not bounce back and miss opportunities.”

  3. Dynamic stability is the key. Weiser calls “dynamic stability” the key to the future. “Flying a helicopter is a great example of dynamic stability,” he proposed. “Helicopter pilots maintain constant awareness of changes in the environment and actively and frequently adjust the controls to hover or fly to where they want.” Leaders and their organizations need the same capabilities to guide and manage their companies. “There is no other way to fly a helicopter successfully and the same goes for leading and managing a business into the future.”

  4. Customer-centricity is now table stakes. "Even before it became trendy to talk about customer experience or customer engagement, many successful companies were already putting those concepts into practice,” observed Weiser. “While it used to be a differentiating choice, now it is a necessary requirement." Customers in the past put up with a lot of cost, inconvenience, and opacity in their buying choices. “Now, power has shifted to the customer,” he continued. “They know more and have more choices. Now it’s imperative that companies quickly resolve these business issues or face, possibly irreversible, consequences to their businesses. “

  5. Your metrics might be holding you back. “A new CEO at a well-known national grocery chain recognized that the chain was not consistently delivering on their long-held and core brand promise of superior customer service,” Weiser recalled. “He quickly realized that one of their main metrics of success, items per labor-hour (a productivity/efficiency measure) disincentivized management from encouraging customer-centric behaviors and investing in customer service like training. De-emphasizing this metric and raising the importance of key customer service metrics helped them pull ahead of competition and achieve better than peer financial results.” It’s time to review how you are measuring your success and ensure that it aligns with the things upon which your customer is measuring your performance.

  6. Tomorrow’s customer might not have a voice in your decision making processes today. “Organizations need to see and consider the need to change earlier, even if it puts some of their present business at risk,” he proposed. “One company I worked with had built a very successful company based on their website.” Salespeople and some leaders were asking for a mobile solution saying that is what customers will want. Management response was that current customers were using and valuing the desktop solution. “Our desktop solution is what makes the company money,” they said. “We don’t know how to do it on a mobile device.” In reality, the customer of the future might not have a seat at the table yet, but should and if they did they certainly don’t care much about how you make money today.

  7. Talk is cheap. Alignment is hard. "Being aligned for or talking about customer-centricity is not enough,” Weiser claimed. “Functions like Marketing, Sales, IT, Finance, and HR need to collaborate and act in an integrated manner to successfully to improve customer experience, increase customer engagement, and drive growth and employee engagement and experience.” To be successful, strategy execution must be a team sport.

  8. Functional excellence is the ball-hogging of business. Weiser recounted that recently too long a CMO at an executive team strategic planning session said his departmental goal is to “build a world-class marketing organization, recognized by the industry.” The CEO pounded the table and said in colorful language that he didn't care about building a world-class department or being recognized by the industry, but rather he wanted to know how the CMO and the marketing department was going to help him grow their business. This is true of any function. Prioritizing functional excellence can undermine overall customer centricity.

  9. C-level leadership needs to coach a new game. "Watching cross-functional leadership mature is like watching children learning to play soccer,” he offered. “At first, they just are amazed at how far the ball goes when kicked. Then they start playing in parallel they all chase the ball.” Which in itself is an early form of alignment. “Then there is some role differentiation and ultimately the most successful teams are the ones that will play as a team, passing the ball and actively assisting each other.” This is accomplished because players learn not only how to play, but more importantly how and why to play together and to keep score. “Not by the number of points they score individually or minutes of playing time, but by how the team performs overall," he concluded.

  10. Change has a cost, but it might be less than you think. "When considering whether to change, organizations need to ask themselves and seriously consider the risk and cost of doing nothing,” Weiser reminded. “Leaders most often over-estimate the cost or risk involved in changing and under-estimate or do not account for the impact of not changing." Whether the change is an adaptation of success metrics, a delegation of decision making, or a strategic pivot, consider the cost of grasping to the illusion of stability.

Achieving dynamic stability provides a chance for your organization to satisfy the customers of today and tomorrow and become the positive disruptor of the customer experience in your industry.

— — —

This article was originally published on Forbes.com.

Comment

On Choice

Comment

On Choice

6.26.18.jpg

“We only see what we look at.  To look is an act of choice.”  John Berger, Ways of Seeing

Comment

LinkNYC: an experiment in wealth creation

Comment

LinkNYC: an experiment in wealth creation

If access to information makes you smarter.

If being smarter and better informed allows for better or faster decision making and better utilization of resources.

If better decisions, lead to better outcomes or results.

And better outcomes lead to the creation of wealth

Then, LinkNYC, with its broad distribution of broadband internet to the streets of New York, might be the largest wealth creation experiment in recent history.

 

Comment

Comment

Warning: Rising Consciousness Ahead

Ask yourself "What do I wish I knew about my business that I don't know?" and "What would I do with the information if I got it?"  If the answer to the second is compelling, try to figure out how to answer the first question.  This applies to other situations like career changes, volunteer work, and even family life.  Raising your consciousness is the first step to real improvements.

Comment

Comment

Doing the Wrong Things Well

I read a great blog post by Dan Pink a few years ago on this topic and thought it was worth remembering. This might be a good one to print out and put by your computer or where decisions are made or priorities are set. Watch against activity that feels good and right, but doesn't clearly lead to results or value that your customers perceive.

Comment