Viewing entries in
#mktginnovation

Smart Fruit: The Internet of Things Goes Bananas

Comment

Smart Fruit: The Internet of Things Goes Bananas

In a recent talk by entrepreneur and researcher Amber Case, she was painting the picture of a future kitchen dystopia where incompatibilities between your smart refrigerator and your smart stove would cause your smart toaster to keep you from using your smart dishwasher. All of this trauma and drama, so that you can have a computer tell you whether your bananas are ripe.

“Bananas have their own built-in ripeness indicator,” she said in exasperation. “They literally change color. It’s a great system.” As it turns out, in our quickening quest for the Internet of Things, we’ve had smart fruit all along.

As most technologists know, companies, big and small, are driving toward the Internet of Things (IoT) — a world in which every device has sensors and is connected. Aimed at making data work more seamlessly in the world and in the enterprise, the IoT movement is affecting everything from wearables and medical devices to home automation and HVAC systems. In our quest for bigger and new, it is important that we not take for granted the natural sensors in our world and intrinsic motivations of the people using these devices.

I am looking out of my window at a beautiful autumn day in Oregon. The leaves are signaling the season in a naturally zero-energy (solar-powered!), renewable and sustainable — not to mention repeatable — process wrapped in a beautiful industrial design precisely tuned to its purpose. Let that inspire our efforts to innovate.

This article was published by InfoComm International.

Comment

Ideas vs Opportunities

Comment

Ideas vs Opportunities

In her book, You Can Kill an Idea, But You Can't Kill an Opportunity author and consultant, Pam Henderson, contrasts ideas to business opportunities and creates a framework for exploring and developing opportunities.  In her vernacular, ideas are the proverbial shiny objects that are tactical in nature and might distract an organization from the real opportunities before them.

As a bit of an "idea factory" myself I do find it important to keep the business goals ever present.  After all, creativity can be waste, unless the unique and original ideas are valuable to your customers or lead your organization forward.

Comment

How to Market "Marketing": a primer for business people who market

Comment

How to Market "Marketing": a primer for business people who market

I just returned from a Frost & Sullivan marketing conference in which I participated in discussions around the alignment of sales and marketing.  The mere mention of the topic brought out emotions on both fronts and it was clear that done poorly, the relationships devolve into a Dilbert cartoon (or “sock puppet theater” as one presenter noted), with both parties suspecting the others of subterfuge and buffoonery. Marketers are often left wondering how they can better market “marketing” within their organizations and to their leadership teams.  

Let’s face it, many companies de-value marketing.  Some consider it the department that makes pretty pictures or that it is simply the administrative support for the sales team.  Others strongly value the strategic involvement of marketing in product strategy, branding, strategic planning, and industry leadership.  I am blessed to work for an organization that models the latter, but I certainly am familiar with the former.

Usually, this lack of respect or understanding for the role of marketing in the organization takes two forms:

  • Exclusion from decision making and strategic conversations (a focus on tactical execution only, often exemplified by only having junior marketing staff who report up into another function like sales or G&A)
  • Lack of adequate resources to do high-quality marketing work (budget, time, or resource limitations that keep the work tactical and reactionary)

This topic is a big one (worthy of more than one post).  To get the conversation started among follow marketers, here are four key questions that you can ask yourself to help you answer the question of how to market “marketing” in your organization.

1. Can you express your motivation for wanting to market marketing in terms of overall business results?

Do you think that investing in a marketing automation system and nurturing campaigns will generate 20% more revenue next year?  Do you believe that improving the brand consistency across the organization will lead to higher customer perception of quality and improve gross margins by 2% for the next product launch?  Do you believe that developing a new interactive platform for sharing product benefits with your sales channel will reduce the sales cycle by 2 months resulting in a 13% increase in revenue with the same effort?  Do you believe that having a seat at the decision making table would improve the company results or employee engagement demonstrably? Can you describe, in plain English or in understandable data, the financial benefits and returns of marketing investments? These are the types of questions you should be asking, when you are thinking of advocating for anything in a business environment.  What is the business impact for the change you are advocating?

If you don't know how to answer these questions, it could be an indication that you are not yet ready to advocate for a larger and more impactful role for marketing in your company... and that you should get ready.  That in itself, should be a call to action to learn more about your business, your drivers of value in the market, your customer problems, your solutions, revenue or customer attribution models, and overall business strategy...and how score is kept financially in your business.  You must strive to be a business person, as well as a marketer.  And today, those should be distinguishable.

And don’t be lured into advocating that there is no ROI on marketing investment.  That is an archaic way of viewing the world and simply isn’t true.  Sure, people have wasted money in “marketing activities” (I’ll get to that below).  Sure, some data is just too expensive to get reliably in marketing (and I would argue, in every other function of a business), so business decisions must be made based on the limited information available. But you can describe the financial impact of nearly every decision of your business and marketing is no exception.  If you find yourself defending "marketing" without data, go watch the movie Moneyballand see yourself reflected in the dialogue between the salty sports recruiters and Brad Pitt’s character.  It’s a new era for business people doing marketing, with more transparency and accountability than ever before, and you must be leading the charge.

2. What is the perception of your brand and that of "marketing" in your organization? What should it be?  What is the gap?

Before you would embark on a brand building campaign, you would always begin with data to identify the "as is" state and to quantify the "to be" state.  And to identify the gap between these states.  Often this accomplished with surveys, voice of the customer, share of voice analysis, or other tools.  Why not do the same thing within your organization to gauge how far away the organization is from what you envision as the ideal?  

It is also important to know whether your brand is strong enough in the organization to lead that charge?  What are you known for, personally, in your organization?  Why do people come to you?  Does that align with what you need it to be to advocate the change you are advocating?  What can you do to change the perception and reputation, if necessary?  Are there projects that you need ot delegate to others (ie, the company holiday party, responsibility for the receptionist, etc) to improve the perception of marketing as strategic in your organization?  Who else do you need to advocate on your behalf?

3. What "marketing" does your customer really need?

This should probably be the first question, as anything (besides that which is required for regulatory, legal, or financial compliance) that isn't seen and appreciated by customers, probably isn't worth doing.  It is the definition of waste and the hallmark of bureaucracy.  But coming back to my point, what value does the customer perceive in the marketing you do?

Are your customers able to make better and faster purchase decisions because of their access to technical information?  Are your resellers able to sell more because of the sales tools you provide?  Are they able to reduce their costs with more accurate quoting resources?  Are they able to achieve business results because of the value proposition of the products you provide?  Does your marketing help set your company and brand apart in measurable ways?

Some service firms have found that dedicated sales and marketing staff is not nearly as effective as sending their consultants right out to their clients to share expertise directly and we their appetite for more (a topic covered extensively in Patrick Lencioni's book Getting Naked).  Some technical engineering firms, web site developers, or agencies find that their engineering teams are best equipped to sell and market to their technical buyers and that all that is needed from marketing is some communication tools to help facilitate these conversations, as learned from colleagues at a recent event held by the Technology Association of Oregon at which I presented on this topic.  In our business at Planar, there is a lot of "marketing" that happens in customer conversations with account managers and technical sales professionals in the field.  This is good and necessary for our technical, system-style products.  Part of the marketing team’s role in this case is to equip their sales colleagues to have these conversations and to aim them at the right targets for best success.  Each business will be different, but successful marketing begins with an understanding of the customer.

and finally...

4. What is the winning formula that is worth repeating?

Like any system, it is important to look and inputs and outputs.  If you want to answer questions 1-3, a good place to start is your wins.  Where are some situations that have gone well that you think are worthy of replication?  Go back and analyze a big order, a design win, or project award and ask everyone involved how it came to be, the touchpoints with the organization, what sales tools or marketing resources were used, and what made the difference.  There is no sense automating or "improving the efficiency" of things that are not effective.  Said another way, finding faster ways to lose money is to find a better way to drive yourself out of business.  But, if you focus on what is going right, you will find a platform from which you can advocate smart change and gain the respect of the organization and the resources to replicate what is working.  And chances are, if you know it is a winning example that can be replicated, others in the organization will as well, and you will have a common foundation to build trust and understanding.

Special thanks to Lisa ColeAllison CerraLeilani Brown, and Mark Wilson for helping to refine these lessons learned.

Comment

Connections Are Everything

Comment

Connections Are Everything

Call it the network effect.  Call it crowd sourcing.  Call it networking.  Call it relationship building.  Call it follow-through.  Call it asking for referrals.  Connections are everything.

It is connections that lead to new business, new insights, and new connections.

And the connections of your connections are even more powerful and far reaching.

Comment

Making Up Words

Comment

Making Up Words

This is one of my favorite made up words: consolidarity.  It is the combination of solidarity and consolidation. It is a group believing things should be combined.  I like thinking about this as it relates to integrated marketing.  Campaigns should be internally consistent and focused on a goal and they should bring groups together for that common good.  Consolidarity.

Comment

Love Your Product: What Butterfly Grove taught me about being visionary?  Part 1

1 Comment

Love Your Product: What Butterfly Grove taught me about being visionary? Part 1

Some children have imaginary friends.  I had an imaginary town.  It was called Butterfly Grove.  Between 2nd and 4th grade, I worked on this multi-faceted project in which I envisioned the life and times of an entire city. 

Taking a fairly comprehensive design approach, I laid out the city (even built a clay model at one point), wrote the town newspaper (The Butterflyer) and envisioned the businesses that would be in the town.  The pet shop was named after my sister, who loved animals.  There was a local branch of the Bank of America.  I designed a book store and coffee shop combo (decades before Starbucks had the idea) called the “Book and Bagel.”  I even have a coupon book from the “Welcome Wagon,” I drew up to promote these businesses.  It was a consuming project that I think back with fond memories to this day.  It is just the kind of thing that I’d probably still enjoy doing.

In those formative years, Butterfly Grove taught me a lot and allowed me to experiment with innovation in ways that I have applied since then.  The first is this:

Love Your Product

Butterfly Grove was a city that I would have wanted to live in.  It had a small town feel, but modern amenities.  I designed all the buildings and decided where they were located. I even got to pick the name of my street. It was the perfect town for my purposes.

In product development circles, there have been experts on both sides of this issue for decades:  should product managers and entrepreneurs be data-driven, maintain passive attachment to their businesses, and keep an open mind with regards to customer feedback to see where to take their products or should they design things for themselves to use?  Those in favor of the dispassionate approach, note the success of professional managers building conglomerate businesses without direct involvement in the business propositions of any one product line.  Biz Stone, a co-founder of Twitter and author of Things a Little Bird Told Me: Confessions of a Creative Mind, falls squarely on the “you have to love and use your product” side of this argument.  So does, Jason Fried, the founder of 37Signals and author of Getting RealRemote, and Rework.

I had an experience with Jason 10 years ago that illustrated this well.  I had contacted the support group at 37Signals whose produce Basecamp I have used to manage a variety of projects over the years. I had been highly recommending this tool and I knew they are always developing new offerings. I suggested to them that they develop a new interactive, collaborative scheduling service. The idea would be that it would allow a person to set up a calendar of events and allow people to RSVP. However, it would be more than an Evite (which is another tool I love and use all the time). The innovation that I was suggesting was that the tool would allow multiple events to be managed from one interface and that it would include an element of capacity planning. Let's say, a hair studio wanted to use a tool like this to accept online appointments. They could enter the number of stylists available throughout the day and the software would prevent people from overbooking, perhaps suggesting alternates that might work or managing a waiting list. I thought this would be cool for a variety of their small business customers and I knew that I could use it right away for a project I was working on for a non-profit “mothers of preschoolers” group.

But, I digress. I sent the idea to them in some detail. I received a response back that surprised me. I thought that I would get a "thank you and we appreciate your submission" generic email and that would be that. Instead, I got a personal email back from Jason at 37Signals that read "We will not be building the software you suggested. We only build things we can use and we wouldn't use this."

Needless to say, I was a little taken back. Jason is known for his strong opinions and, perhaps, email missives of this type are common in their organization. But, the whole thing got me thinking.

Here is a company that is very well-respected and builds great tools. They got a suggestion for what would be a great product (in my humble opinion) and they said, "no." No, because it wasn't something they were passionate about. No, because they wouldn't personally use it.  If they had been running a pet grooming salon, a community center, or a doctor’s office, perhaps they would have seen the value.  Since then, others have developed online scheduling tools for various purposes (from SignUpGenius to Doodle), but there still isn’t a great single tool that I know of for scheduling.   So, my "collaborative scheduling" idea is out there for someone to develop!

Thinking back to those days spent on Butterfly Grove, I was certainly an amateur city planner in every sense of the word.  The definition of “amateur” is someone who engages in an activity for pleasure, instead of financial benefit. The root of the word is the same French-Middle English word for "love."  Someone who is motivated by the love of something.  It has been said that if you do something you love, you will never have to work a day in your life.  Butterfly Grove didn’t feel like work.   I think this is a powerful lesson for innovation.  Work like an amateur and build something you love.

1 Comment

Comment

Collaborate

On things big and small.  With team mates you have known forever or those you have just met.  Don't delay in collaborating.

Comment

Celebrate

Comment

Celebrate

It was great to celebrate with the students, mentors, and sponsors of Marathon Scholars, this weekend and see the amazing potential that is being realized in these young scholars!

The big thing and the small things.  The unexpected and the planned.  The new and the old.  Don't delay in celebrating all that is great today!

Comment

Comment

Question of the Week

You can always find reasons to be more conservative, be smaller, and sit back.  But what if you didn't?  What do you lose by being bolder?  What do you lose by not being bold?

Comment

Comment

Jennifer Davis to Speak on the Tie Between Sales and Marketing

The tension between marketing and sales is common enough that it’s a regular theme in Dilbert cartoons, but it doesn’t have to be! Building a strong partnership from product concept all the way to product launch is critical to a company’s success.

Join the Technology Association of Oregon on June 9th for the next Marketing Leadership Exchange. Jennifer Davis, VP or Marketing and Product Strategy, from Planar will discuss how Planar’s marketing and sales teams work together to create and managed shared goals, tracking, idea generation, and how they go about building a strong partnership.

In addition to the valuable content exchange, the Marketing Leadership Exchange is a great way to network with your peers in a safe environment where the top marketing professional at technology companies can openly discuss business issues.

To register for this event, visit the TAO events page.

Comment